subtitle

Recently there was a comment on this blog that there are others who choose the former camera Canon 1d mark IIN (2005) compared with the Canon 1000D (2009). The reason is quite simple friend, because the Canon 1D Mark IIN is a pro camera.



Actually, what's the difference between pro and not the camera? In my opinion, is not actually a camera that labeled pro or amateur. There is a beginners camera, which is identical with a simple to use and relatively lighter and smaller. While sophisticated camera is a camera that is more complex to operate and have the quality of the camera body is more severe and weatherproof.

More appropriate label for the pro given to the photographer than the camera. Pro photographer is someone who relies on income from most of the photography sector.

Kaerena that, though a photographer using a beginner SLR camera, pocket camera or even mobile phone cameras, still photographers are professional photographers. And vice versa, although using a sophisticated camera, but only use the camera for a hobby, then the person is still called amateur photographers.

But you need to be alert, too, if you want to make money with a camera novice, then you must make sure your photos of client satisfaction, because if not, it could be a reason to sue you in court.

Return to the original question, whether the decision to buy Canon 1D Mark IIN wiser than the 1000D? When viewed from the side of technology, 1d mark IIN, which is output in 2005 must have been outdated. Almost all aspects of the camera image resolution, auto focus, high quality LCD screen. Thus in buying the camera, should not get stuck with the label merely pro camera.

http://www.infofotografi.com/blog/